CA
CPI AEROSTRUCTURES INC (CVU)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered sequential and year-over-year improvement: revenue of $19.27M vs $15.18M in Q2 2025 and $19.42M in Q3 2024; gross margin expanded to 22.3% (from 4.4% in Q2 and 21.7% YoY); net income rose to $1.11M and diluted EPS to $0.09 (vs $(0.10) in Q2 2025 and $0.06 YoY) .
- Mix and efficiency were the primary drivers; management cited “improved product mix and efficiencies” driving +60 bps gross margin and +49% net income YoY; adjusted EBITDA grew 17% YoY to $1.94M .
- Backlog remained robust at $509M (Sep 30), buoyed by an RTX missile wing assembly award (deliveries start 2026) and additional USAF T-38 kit orders ($10.2M) during Q3; total debt declined to $15.9M, an all‑time low according to management .
- Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q3 revenue/EPS was unavailable, limiting formal beat/miss assessment; catalysts center on sustained mix improvement, backlog conversion, and execution on new programs while A‑10 headwinds wane .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Margin/earnings recovery: gross margin rose to 22.3% (vs 4.4% in Q2) and net income reached $1.11M with diluted EPS $0.09; CEO: “improved product mix and efficiencies” led to a 60 bps YoY gross margin increase and 49% net income increase .
- Non-GAAP profitability improved: adjusted EBITDA was $1.94M, +17% YoY; nine‑month adjusted EBITDA ex-A‑10 was $3.90M, highlighting underlying earnings power post A‑10 .
- Commercial momentum and balance sheet: new RTX missile wing assemblies award and $10.2M of USAF orders support backlog ($509M) while total debt fell to $15.9M; management emphasized this as a “strategic win” expanding into missiles/adjacent markets .
What Went Wrong
- Year-to-date still pressured by A‑10 termination: 9M 2025 revenue $49.85M vs $59.31M and gross margin 13.3% (20.4% ex‑A‑10); 9M net loss $(1.54)M vs income $2.33M .
- Prior-quarter disruption: Q2 gross margin dropped to 4.4% with $(1.33)M net loss due to A‑10 write-offs, underscoring sensitivity to legacy program clean-up .
- Controls note in Q2: management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting tied to debt classification pending a covenant amendment, with remediation underway (no financial result impact claimed) .
Financial Results
Notes: Q2 and Q1 were impacted by A‑10 termination charges; management provides ex‑A‑10 views for context .
Actual vs Consensus (Q3 2025)
KPIs
Segment breakdown: Not applicable; the company does not present segments in the press release .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available in our document set; themes are derived from company 8-K press releases.
Management Commentary
- “Our third quarter 2025 performance was stronger than third quarter 2024 on all fronts, with improved product mix and efficiencies resulting in 60 basis points gross profit margin increase and a 49% net income increase… third quarter‑adjusted EBITDA of $1.9 million is 17% higher than third quarter 2024.” — Dorith Hakim, President & CEO .
- “We… continued to improve our balance sheet… total debt down to an all‑time low of $15.9 million and our Debt‑to‑Adjusted EBITDA Ratio to 2.6 excluding the impact of the A‑10 Program termination.” .
- “We are also pleased to receive an award from Raytheon… to manufacture structural missile wing assemblies… deliveries starting in 2026… adding to our backlog of $509 million.” .
- Prior quarter context: “We took a $2.3 million write‑off on the A‑10 Program… Without the impact of the terminated A‑10 Program, we performed well… first Advanced Tactical Flight Pod delivery to Raytheon.” .
- Q1 setup: “First quarter 2025 results were significantly impacted by… a pre‑tax loss of $2.1 million on our A‑10 Program… gross profit without the A‑10 Program impact was 21.6%.” .
Q&A Highlights
- No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available in our document set; as such, Q&A themes and clarifications cannot be sourced for this period [ListDocuments: earnings-call-transcript returned none for Q3 window].
Estimates Context
- S&P Global (Capital IQ) consensus for Q3 2025 EPS and revenue was unavailable via our tool; actuals were revenue $19.27M and diluted EPS $0.09. Without consensus, we cannot determine a formal beat or miss for the quarter .
- Implications: Given sequential recovery and YoY margin/earnings improvement, estimate revisions may skew higher for near‑term profitability assuming mix/efficiency trends persist and A‑10 headwinds do not recur, but this depends on backlog conversion and program execution .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Sequential rebound and YoY improvement: revenue recovered to $19.27M and gross margin to 22.3%, restoring adjusted EBITDA to $1.94M; evidence of underlying earnings power ex‑A‑10 .
- Mix tailwinds: management attributes gains to mix and efficiencies, a potentially durable driver as legacy A‑10 rolls off and new programs scale .
- Backlog supports visibility: $509M backlog plus RTX missile wing award and USAF T‑38 orders bolster medium‑term demand; watch 2026 deliveries on RTX award .
- Deleveraging trend: total debt reduced to $15.9M; Debt/Adj. EBITDA ex‑A‑10 at 2.6 provides balance sheet flexibility .
- Near‑term watch items: conversion of backlog to revenue/margins, any further legacy program clean‑ups, and remediation of the Q2 material weakness in ICFR .
- Trading setup: Absent consensus data, narrative catalysts include continued margin expansion, program execution milestones (e.g., Raytheon pod systems, missile assemblies), and incremental defense orders.
- Risk factors: program timing/deferrals, cost control on fixed‑price contracts, and dependency on large defense primes; Q2 demonstrated margin sensitivity to legacy program adjustments .
Citations
- Q3 2025 press release and financials: .
- Q2 2025 press release and financials: .
- Q1 2025 press release and financials: .
- Additional press releases (orders/awards; trading activity): .
S&P Global estimates note: Consensus values for CVU in Q3 2025 were unavailable via the S&P Global tool during this analysis; actuals listed above are from company filings/press releases .